Langsung ke konten utama

Response paper to Interreligious dialogue and Ethical aims of social inquiry (Academic study of Religion)


Bellah believes that study of religion must have ethical aims. He justifies his conclusion with brilliant examples from many researches in scientific works which always include the aim for their results. For instance, he tells the aim of Leviathan’s Hobbes is about making peace and social control in the society. Based on that proofs, Bellah convinces that every scientific works should be emphasized in the end of research, not in the process of research. The end of research is about the ethical aim they have to do or concern after that research. Bellah promotes that the end of scientific result is moral value such as “to listen, to reflect, to criticize and to respond as the tasks of social inquiry”[1] for making a better life in future.
Dunbar promotes “interreligious dialogue” as one of the works of academic study of religion. For Dunbar, interreligious dialogue is “respectful communication between two or more persons committed to different religions about issues of religious significance, in a common attitude of open mindedness.”[2] Based on that definition, Dunbar argues that interreligious dialogue must contain four requirements: “1) interpersonal communication, 2) different religious commitment, 3) a mutual attitude of respect and open mindedness, 4) significant religious content in or implied by the conversation.”[3] From that explanation, it can be concluded that interreligious dialogue is the two side conversation equally and fairly, and one aim for reaching better understanding the others.
Relating Dunbar to Bellah, interreligious dialogue can be one of the ethical aims of social inquiry foremost in the academic study of religion. It is quite possible because Bellah and Dunbar impose the aim and the process of scientific works must be ended by moral aim, to get better life in future. The advantage of interreligious dialogue is that every person or religion can stand equally and fairly without fearing to become inferior group in that dialogue. This dialogue is possible because the members realize and have consciousness first that they gather together for making dialogue to get comprehensive understanding one another. The drawback of interreligious dialogue is sometimes it merely formal activity. There is no further action how to make it real in the realm of religious life.
The problem between interreligious dialogue and academic study of religion is about the “objectivity”. Dunbar argues that the objectivity of religious studies makes only stereotypes and cannot prevent the problem in the future. Thus, he proposes three ways of studying interreligious dialogue as descriptive, prescriptive and experiential way[4]. Those explanations mean that the dialogue will be attractive and more helpful by throwing away the principle of objectivity within.
To sum up, the ethical aim of social inquiry can be found in interreligious dialogue. With several requirements, interreligious dialogue offers the broader perspective and solution for many problems within religion and inter-religion for getting better understanding and life in the future.

[1] Robert N Bellah, The Ethical aims of Social inquiry, p.  401
[2] Daniel Scott Dunbar. The place of interreligious dialogue in the academic study of religion. p. 2
[3] Ibid
[4] Ibid. p. 10
Label:

Komentar

Posting Komentar

Thanks for your comment. God bless you always. :)

Postingan populer dari blog ini

September

September Kulipat mimpi Kukantongi mantra Lihat, tak ada lagi duka Lihat, rindu kita melanglang buana Ini September Saat kita segera berangkat Memula masa singkat, meski Menyimpan geletar gelap Dan sendu tasbih para malaikat Melukis gemerlap esok Merajut dunia Melibas prahara Tak usah bersedih Sedang kesedihan pun mulai bosan Jadi teman kecil kita Mari sulut semangat Biar berkilat semua karat Dan benderang semua pekat Untuk Bunga Kutulis puisi untukmu Agar terketuk segala pintu Dan terbuka segala rahasia Kita benar-benar berbeda Meski Waktu selalu saja cemburu Dengan diam yang kita bicarakan Dengan cerita yang kita bisukan Untuk Bunga Engkaulah penanda baru Pada setiap jejak yang kubuat Untuk memintal ruang waktu Meski jauh menjadi karib Meski koma menjelma titik Demi Waktu Demi Waktu Manusia selalu berada dalam kerugian Demi Waktu Manusia tempat segala kesalahan Demi Waktu Manusia-lah kekasi...
Posting Komentar
Baca selengkapnya

The Toughest Week

I would genuinely say that this week is one of the hardest. Problems visit like a flood, not giving me some time to breathe. However, I fortunately feel okay, considering it as a process that can make me stronger. First, my boss decided to cut off my salary this morning because of giving the batiks that I should make into office's uniform into my friend from Philippine. I did it because I felt bad to invite him to my pesantren without handing over such souvenir. I thought that I can buy it another batiks which has similar pattern (kawung) at Beringharjo market. However, my boss had different view and the result is that he punished me by cutting my salary as a substitute to price of batiks he provided to me. It is rather funny I guess, but I will not make a mess with that small problem. I should fully accept it as a risk when I hand my office's gift into other. Second, I failed to secure some money to pay rent for the house. Therefore, I turn up into the last choice to ...
Posting Komentar
Baca selengkapnya

Berotak Tekad, Berhati Malaikat; a Tribute to Undar Jombang

18 September 1965, tanggal kelahiran Undar Jombang. Sudah begitu tua, setua Gus Mujib, Neng Eyik dan Gus Lukman yang sampai sekarang masih menjadi penguasa-penguasa Undar, asyik mengangkangi “tahta kecil” mereka. Tapi Undar memang istimewa, biarpun dihantam krisis kepemimpinan sejak lama, sampai sekarang masih saja berdiri kukuh. Menantang langit, mengukir jaman. Undar selalu ada, tapi sedihnya, mungkin ia juga pelan-pelan menjadi tiada. Timbul tenggelam, mencari pegangan kesana kemari tanpa pertolongan siapapun. Bukan karena tidak ada yang menolong, tapi karena Undar sendiri yang menolaknya. Di stasiun Purwokerto, jam 6 pagi pada akhir Juli 2004, aku bersama seorang sahabat karib menaiki kereta Logawa jurusan Purwokerto – Surabaya. Tiket seharga 21 ribu selalu kupegang erat-erat. Ini perjalananku pertama kali yang jauh dari Cilacap, kota kelahiranku. Hari itu, aku dan temanku berangkat ke Jombang, untuk nyantri dan kuliah di Universitas Darul Ulum Jombang. Sejak melihat brosur ka...
Posting Komentar
Baca selengkapnya