Langsung ke konten utama

Response paper to Clifford Geertz: The Religion of Java (Theories of Religion and Society)


Geertz’ concept about Abangan, Santri and Priyayi is no longer enough to analyze the religious differentiation in Javanese today because he has lack of understanding of each group, especially Santri’s development today. Geertz has a great idea how to analyze and see the religio-social reality in Java with his concept of that 3 groups. But it still does not work to analyze the rapid development now, especially in Santri’s group.
Geertz has identified Javanese people into 3 groups, Abangan, Santri and Priyayi. The Abangan is a representation of farmer, Priyayi for bureaucracy and Santri for seller in the market. This identification was so helpful at the time and became the majority perspective for long time. As the time goes by, this categorization has many critics and disagreement from other scholars. The main critique is the application of those categories into the reality of Javanese today. Many critiques said that for example, if someone was identified as an Abangan now, how do We know that he is an Abangan people. If he is a farmer, it does not work well when we see that many farmers in village are Santri too, they go to mosque and pray there.
Most of the Geertz’ categorization of Javanese people is not applicable in the reality. Some scholars, for example, Abdul Munir Mulkhan had given another categorization for Javanese people, especially in Santri’s group. He categorized that know we have an hybrid group between Abangan, Santri and Priyayi. His thesis called “Santrinisasi birokrasi and Birokratisasi Santri” tells us about the diffusion of each group’s role from the sharing power in the government. This categorization is based on the research on Suharto’s era, when Suharto has recruited many people to be bureaucrats. This policy has converted many people to be hybrid group because Suharto used many terms and rules from religious values, especially Islam.
Today, the Greetz’ categorization is not imposed as majority analysis in Javanese or generally Indonesian people because it has many contradiction in the reality. Although it does not work well now, Geertz has given us the new perspective for knowing the people’s constellation since his theory was released and influenced many studies of Indonesian people. 
Label:

Komentar

Posting Komentar

Thanks for your comment. God bless you always. :)

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Deram Senja

Deram Senja Deram senja ini mendorongku lena dari sepi sunyi lorong matahari liang-liung makna meliuki padang jiwa dan satire yang kita buat sore ini semakin pahit untuk kita rasa lelap gelap tidurkan mata tapi tidak detak jantungmu yang senantiasa resah berisi mimpi dan luka ; deram senjaku menderu ragu Megatruh O, Indonesiaku dengarlah rindu ini merimba mencari jejak-jejak fana yang kabur diterpa sendu angin selatan kering tanpa rupa garing tanpa rasa dimana mesti kutorehkan? segala harap dan igauan tidurku mengharap kebaikan zaman segera memihak kita menjaya dan  O, Indonesiaku O, Indonesiaku Padang Mantra masih kupeluk erat-erat sebungkus mimpi yang kubeli tadi pagi di gegap riuh boulevard kata sumpah mati terasa mulutku menjadi gagap terasa lidahku menjadi pengap terasa kerongkonganku menjadi cekat tiba-tiba selaksa mantra mengalir lancar mengiris penuh warna meluncuri palung-...
1 komentar
Baca selengkapnya

Sidrot

Ronta Hati Kosong mengudara Tembus sekat waktu Cahaya merembesi ruang Dan sepi meraja bumi Tak terkira sudah ronta hati Menusuk janji terucap Mungkin sudah jalannya Jikalau isyarat tlah mampu Menutupi leluka Biar Waktu sembuhkan ia Mimpi belumlah purna Mirip awan berarak Merindu senja langit Agar mau mengantarnya Ke peraduan malam Hujan merinai Membuka bendungan awan Tetesnya menjadi awal Untuk keajaiban yang kan datang Tak perlu risau Biarkan warna langit Selalu biru Sebab matahari Senantiasa hadir Menyanjung musim semi Kidung Filsuf Socrates mengajar gelisah Plato menggubah ide Aristotel membelah materi Averroes menobatkan wali Ghazali menghidukan ilmu Nawawi menyebar fikih Ini aku Beku sendiri Lantunkan kidungku Yang tak tentu Juga jemu tak mampu Mendengar mereka Mengikuti mereka Mendukung mereka Sidrot Muhammad membelah langit Melihat masa depan Dengan mata batin Memilih kebaikan Memohonkan keringanan Burak mengantar Jibril m...
Posting Komentar
Baca selengkapnya

Islamic Education Challenge

The First World Conference on Muslim Education at Mecca, 1977 concluded that the purpose of Islamic Education is “to create a good and pious human being, who devotes Allah, builds their personal structure compatibly with Islamic Sharia and gets all of their daily life as the manifestation of their obedience to Allah”.   The key word for this conclusion is that the purpose of Islamic education tends to build a good character of human beings. Is that true? Yes! Everybody will agree that our Islamic education is about making a perfect human from all sides, here and hereafter. However, what factor that has been missed from that statement? The first, we can see that the ideal purpose is about human beings. How to make good and pious human beings is the central issue for Islamic education. In this sense, we have forgotten the other factor in every education; it is the structure of education itself. Why is the structure important? The answer is that there is no education system with...
Posting Komentar
Baca selengkapnya