Response
paper to Religion and Identity
Gregory Hooks: Can Grand Theories of The State Help Us
Envision A Grand Theory of Peace?
Name : Anwar Masduki Azzam
Class : CRCS 2012
Reading
this article, I found the pessimistic conclusion that there is a blur future to
make peace around this world. Hooks argues that if we merely rely on the
Westphalian states, we should be aware that those states will always wage war
for ensuring and reaching the sovereignty and autonomy from other state. Thus,
the function of several states organization such as United Nations is very
unrealistic to make peace in the world.
I
would argue that this is very different from my understanding about the role of
state and the effort to make a peace. If we merely see states as only the
contestant for the other state, I could say that there are a lot of states
which can build a peace each others. For example, the peace relation between
Indonesia and Timor Leste recently will ensure us that there is a glimmer hope
of peace in this condition, a westphalian states. State plays important role to
build a new peace, even though they (Indonesia and Timor Leste) have waged a
war each other in the past.
I
myself agree that the meaning of peace is more than the absence of war.
However, I found this article merely talk about the role of state and society
which could not make peace as long as they place themselves in an equal
position among them. This requires state and society not to discriminate or
press the other. It means that peace is the absence of conflict in their life.
Well, surely I doubt this. People, society or even state will always bring
themselves into the conflict circle, because we are always political. We cannot
ignore this fact that our everyday life always contains conflict.
Here
I see that there is no consistency in this article. In the last, while imposing
that the state should be aware about the role of conflict in the transnational
state (example: UN and EU), Hooks proposes the effort to understand and pay
attention more in regional dynamics. The word “dynamics” itself contains
conflict. We cannot ignore the fact that the building of our states is always
about contesting, powering and mastering each others. That is the great example
of politics. Since we cannot ignore it, it will be better for us to make peace
using the power of conflict itself. We can propose that the meaning of peace is
about our dynamic in the real political life. It is because people and state
are always political.
Komentar
Posting Komentar
Thanks for your comment. God bless you always. :)